Skip to content
Home » News » The Social Media Experiment: How an Era of Unchecked Digital Optimism Set the Stage for Cultural Crisis

The Social Media Experiment: How an Era of Unchecked Digital Optimism Set the Stage for Cultural Crisis

For over a decade, the Western world has been enthralled by social media. Policymakers, tech entrepreneurs, and ordinary citizens alike have hailed platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok as engines of social connection, economic growth, and even political empowerment. By the early 2020s, the reach of these platforms was nearly total: more than 70% of Americans and over 80% of Britons were regular social media users, according to Pew Research Center and Ofcom.

But what have we learned from this vast, unplanned experiment in digital culture? And why did a sense of unease begin to grow, especially among researchers and young people themselves, well before I called out social media’s damaging effects on Western youth culture?

This article explores the data, cultural shifts, and policy debates that prompted a critical re-evaluation—and led to a growing body of scholarship calling for greater scrutiny of Big Tech’s role in shaping young lives.

1. The Digital Gold Rush: Explosive Growth and Early Optimism

The late 2000s and early 2010s saw social media touted as a force for good. In the United States, adoption of social platforms skyrocketed: the US Census Bureau reported that by 2019, over 86% of 18- to 29-year-olds and 80% of 30- to 49-year-olds were active social media users. The UK followed suit, with Ofcom reporting in 2022 that 96% of 16- to 24-year-olds used social media daily (Ofcom Media Nations, 2022).

Early studies and government reports praised the sector’s economic dynamism. The UK Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) estimated that digital and creative industries contributed £151.9 billion to the UK economy in 2019, supporting millions of jobs. In the US, a Brookings Institution analysis found that social media companies had created a vast “digital gig” sector, giving rise to the creator economy and new forms of entrepreneurship.

It all seemed to signal progress—until it didn’t.

2. The Dark Side Emerges: Rising Anxiety, Loneliness, and Depression

While economists lauded digital innovation, clinicians, educators, and parents started noticing something else: young people, despite being more “connected” than ever, were struggling. The numbers became hard to ignore.

A pivotal study in Clinical Psychological Science found that between 2010 and 2015, rates of depressive symptoms among US teens rose by 33% and suicide rates by nearly 31% (Twenge et al., 2018). In the UK, NHS Digital’s Mental Health of Children and Young People in England, 2021 found that one in six children aged 6 to 16 had a probable mental health disorder, up from one in nine just four years earlier.

Researchers quickly zeroed in on social media as a major factor. A comprehensive meta-analysis in Nature Communications (2022) showed a “strong association between high-frequency social media use and poorer mental health outcomes among adolescents in both the US and UK” (Orben et al., 2022). This included increases in loneliness, cyberbullying, anxiety, and a marked drop in self-esteem.

3. “Comparison Culture” and Body Image

Social media’s impact wasn’t just psychological—it was physical, especially for young women and girls. Instagram and Snapchat, in particular, became engines for self-comparison.

A peer-reviewed study in JAMA Pediatrics (2021) found that adolescent girls in the US and UK who spent more time on image-based social media reported higher rates of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating (Fardouly et al., 2021). Similar findings emerged from the UK’s Royal Society for Public Health, whose #StatusOfMind survey ranked Instagram as the platform most likely to negatively affect young people’s mental health.

Even the US Congress took note. In 2021, the release of Facebook’s internal “Instagram for Teens” research, reported by the Wall Street Journal, made headlines with revelations that the company knew its products were harming young users.

4. Algorithmic Manipulation and Data Monetization

Economic optimism gave way to unease as evidence mounted that Big Tech’s profit model was predicated on maximizing user engagement at any cost—even if it undermined well-being.

The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) introduced the “Children’s Code” in 2021, requiring platforms to redesign for safety, but compliance has been inconsistent. The US Federal Trade Commission also began investigating platform algorithms, with a 2023 FTC report warning that social media recommendation engines were “nudging children and teens towards content correlated with anxiety, risky behavior, and digital addiction.”

Economic data supports the scale of the issue. In 2022, US social media ad revenue hit $72.3 billion (Statista, 2023), fueled by ever more sophisticated algorithmic targeting.

5. The Economic Paradox: A Boon and a Burden

It’s easy to see why governments and investors were slow to challenge Big Tech: social media has undeniably created wealth. In the UK, the creative digital sector grew by 7.4% per year between 2010 and 2020 (DCMS, 2020), far outpacing the wider economy. The “creator economy” promised new pathways to prosperity—anyone could become an influencer, a micro-entrepreneur, a star.

But by 2021, cracks were showing. The Economist highlighted how “algorithmic amplification of outrage and comparison” was fueling youth anxiety, diminishing productivity, and even polarizing democracies (The Economist, 2021). Meanwhile, the Brookings Institution raised concerns that the rise of gig work—much of it mediated through social media—was eroding labor protections (Brookings, 2021).

6. Policy Response: Regulation and a New Caution

By the early 2020s, Western governments were forced to respond. The UK’s Online Safety Bill promised the “most comprehensive online safety legislation in the world.” The US Congress ramped up hearings and bipartisan calls for social media regulation, as detailed in the 2022 US Senate hearings.

Yet, implementation lags and industry resistance have slowed progress. Many critics argue that platforms’ economic incentives remain unchanged.

7. The Stage Is Set for a Reckoning

By 2023, the cumulative evidence—from peer-reviewed journals, economic data, public health warnings, and lived experience—was overwhelming. Social media had changed everything, but not always for the better.

Researchers, including myself, began to ask: Was the digital experiment a success, or did we sleepwalk into a crisis of youth well-being, atomized community, and economic precarity? What would it take for culture, politics, and business to face the consequences—and what could we do about it?

These are the questions that led directly to delve deeper into the topic. The optimism that launched the social media era has faded. The debate now is how to repair the damage, and to imagine a better way forward for the next generation.

Key Sources & Further Reading: